Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: Fix osc flag setup ordering to allow pciehotplug use when available

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:34:11PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Stefan]
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
>> > slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
>> > uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
>> > pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
>> > pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
>> > to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
>> > devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
>> > until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
>> > slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.
>>
>> I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
>> is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.
>>
>> Is this a fix for problems like
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
>> an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
>> "acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
>> claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
>> though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.
>>
> Yes, that bug is precisely what I am trying to fix (although your wording above is
> inverted from the problem in the bug).  What happens is that acpiphp claims the
> pcie ports, because acpiphp init runs first, and we haven't yet parsed _OSC,
> which would have told acpiphp to yield control to pciehp.  The initial fix I
> proposed fixed this by parsing _OSC prior to running the acpiphp bus scan, but
> that reintroduced the problem of not handling pcie 1.1 aspm properly.  That has
> been fixed in v2/v3 by deferring the setting of aspm_disable until after the bus
> scan.
>
> Shall I submit a v4 with an updated changelog?

No need, I'll update the changelog and include the bugzilla reference
and post it for your approval.  Thanks!

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/