Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug: Add FRAME_POINTER anti-dependency for ARC

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef
Date: Mon Sep 02 2013 - 05:03:02 EST


Hi,

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Frame pointer on ARC doesn't serve the conventional purpose of stack
> unwinding due to the typical way ABI designates it's usage.

More out of curiosity to understand the platform better than actual
review - can you explain a little what
you meant by this statement?

Is this statement because of the use of write back mode with ld/st to
or not related?

Thanks,
Gilad


--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com

"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/