RE: [PATCH] lockref: remove cpu_relax() again

[Luck, Tony]

> That said, another thing that strikes me is that you have 32 CPU
> threads, and the stupid test-program I sent out had MAX_THREADS set to
> 16.  Did you change that? Becuase if not, then some of the extreme
> performance profile might be about how the threads get scheduled on
> your machine (HT threads vs full cores etc).

I'll try to get new numbers with 32 threads[*] - but even if they look good, I'd
be upset about the 16 thread case being worse with the cmpxchg/no-cpu-relax
case than the original code.

-Tony

[*] probably not till tomorrow
èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆàþY&—