Re: [ 00/36] 3.10.11-stable review
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Fri Sep 06 2013 - 14:48:46 EST
On 09/06/2013 12:45 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:36:46AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 09/05/2013 02:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.11 release.
There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat Sep 7 20:26:25 UTC 2013.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.11-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
3.10.11-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.10.10
Compiled and booted on the following systems:
Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for
this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No
regressions in warn.
Thanks for testing and letting me know.
Compile tested on Samsung Chromebook Exynos5 (ARMv7):
Note: Hoping to run boot tests on this new test system, but I was
able to compile the 3.10.11-rc1 on this system running Ubuntu 13.04
so far.
"able", or "unable"? What's the problem you are getting?
Compiled just fine. No issues with compile and installed fine. I am
figuring out the boot-loader config on this system to be able to boot
the new image. Will get there soon. :)
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/