Re: [PATCH] ehea: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED

[Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:46:11AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
> 
> It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
> index 35853b4..04e0ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static int ehea_reg_interrupts(struct net_device *dev)
> 
>  	ret = ibmebus_request_irq(port->qp_eq->attr.ist1,
>  				  ehea_qp_aff_irq_handler,
> -				  IRQF_DISABLED, port->int_aff_name, port);
> +				  0, port->int_aff_name, port);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		netdev_err(dev, "failed registering irq for qp_aff_irq_handler:ist=%X\n",
>  			   port->qp_eq->attr.ist1);
> @@ -1303,8 +1303,7 @@ static int ehea_reg_interrupts(struct net_device *dev)
>  			 "%s-queue%d", dev->name, i);
>  		ret = ibmebus_request_irq(pr->eq->attr.ist1,
>  					  ehea_recv_irq_handler,
> -					  IRQF_DISABLED, pr->int_send_name,
> -					  pr);
> +					  0, pr->int_send_name, pr);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			netdev_err(dev, "failed registering irq for ehea_queue port_res_nr:%d, ist=%X\n",
>  				   i, pr->eq->attr.ist1);
> @@ -3320,7 +3319,7 @@ static int ehea_probe_adapter(struct platform_device *dev)
>  	}
> 
>  	ret = ibmebus_request_irq(adapter->neq->attr.ist1,
> -				  ehea_interrupt_neq, IRQF_DISABLED,
> +				  ehea_interrupt_neq, 0,
>  				  "ehea_neq", adapter);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&dev->dev, "requesting NEQ IRQ failed\n");
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 

Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/