Re: cpufreq_stats NULL deref on second system suspend

[Viresh Kumar]

On 12 September 2013 22:56, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 09:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Anyway, nevermind, as of now, subsystems do work around this suitably, so
> there is no known bug as such at the present. Just that we could have probably
> done it a better way, that's all.

Yeah, there is no bug as of now due to the number of hacks adopted by different
framework.. I believe we can still have a cleanup series to take care
of this stuff..
That would be some improvement and would be better for future.. Otherwise
this kind of problems would keep coming again and again..

> You're absolutely right! Regular CPU hotplug is more demanding than
> suspend/resume in the context we are discussing, since any CPU can be
> hotplugged at any time and put back in any order. So code like cpufreq should
> be prepared to work with any ordering.

And that part is well implemented and tested as far as I know..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/