Re: [PATCH 21/33] clk: ux500: Add Device Tree support for the PRCCKernel clock

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> But if you still don't like this, let me cook a counter-patch so
>> I can realized on my own how terribly wrong I am...
>
> I'm going to yank all of the clk_register_clkdev() calls out
> imminently anyway, so all those these hiding bugs will soon become
> apparent in any case. Why don't I place my 'remove ATAGs' patch-set
> on top of this one and then finally remove the clk_register_clkdev()s
> and watch the carnage ensue?

So that creates problem for me as maintainer if I need to
pull or revert some of the patches on top of the stack, all of
a sudden the file looks horrible. That is why I want every step
to be as clean a cut as possible.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/