Re: [PATCH 0/2] vsprintf: ignore %n again

[Tetsuo Handa]

Kees Cook wrote:
> > ---------- output start ----------
> > const : literal
> > not const : const char *
> > not const : const char []
> > const : const char * const
> 
> What version of gcc did you use? I don't get the last as const, for
> some reason. And as Dan mentions, shouldn't const char[] be detected
> as const too?

This worked on

  gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)
  gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)

with -On (where n != 0), but didn't work on

  gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3

. Oops...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/