Re: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 08:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> sa11x0_pcmcia_init() which starts this chain of events is called as
>> an fs_initcall(), see drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c
>
> But fs_initcall() comes after arch_initcall() right? (looking at
> include/linux/init.h). Since the corresponding cpufreq-driver (drivers/
> cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c) uses arch_initcall() to register itself, it
> is all the more surprising how this could happen...

Hm it does happen if the cpufreq driver does not probe *at all*
right? I will look closer at this, maybe it just doesn't register
properly for some SA1100 variants...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/