Re: [PATCH 4/9] of/irq: Introduce of_irq_get()

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:24:47PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

>> *_get typically also implies some reference counting which I don't
>> believe this does. I don't think having 2 functions with completely
>> different names doing the same thing with only a different calling
>> convention is good either. So I would keep the old name and the names
>> aligned.
>
> Okay, I'll make the new function __irq_of_parse_and_map().

I don't know why i detest __prefixing so much but I think it's
really nasty.

Usually this is reserved for compiler- and linker related things,
like __packed;  or __init.

I would prefer irq_of_parse_and_map_strict() or something
like that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/