RE: [RFC] clk: samsung: Remove old clock drivers for s5pc100 ands5pv210

From: Kukjin Kim
Date: Thu Sep 26 2013 - 01:44:20 EST


Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
>
> This patch removes old clock management code for S5PC100 and
> S5PC110/S5PV210,
> since the platform has been already moved to the new clock driver
> using Common Clock Framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch series require
> S5PC100 and S5PV210 patch series moving to common clock framework.
>
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1361 -----------------------------------
> ----
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1365 -----------------------------------
> -----
> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2730 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
>
In this case, would be easier to review with using "-D" for format-patch.

And this should be followed by moving common clk series for s5pc100/s5pv210.
See s3c64xx common clk patches in v3.13-next/common-clk-s3c64xx branch as a
reference.

And I have never seen common clk stuff for s5pc100. In addition, I'm not
sure we _still_ need to support s5pc100 in mainline.

Thanks,
- Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/