Re: [PATCH 16/21] cpuidle: avoid unnecessary kzalloc/free of struct cpuidle_device_kobj

[Viresh Kumar]

On 26 September 2013 03:42, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> We always need to allocate struct cpuidle_device_kobj for all CPUs and so there
>> is no real need to have a pointer to it inside struct cpuidle_device.
>>
>> This patch makes a object instance of struct cpuidle_device_kobj inside struct
>> cpuidle_device instead of a pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> nack, it was made in purpose for kobject_init_and_add.
>
> see commit 728ce22b696f9f1404a74d7b2279a65933553a1b

Ahh.. sorry for missing that one :(

Now that I understand why it was introduced, I am thinking if
we can make hotplug path a bit fast? By not freeing sysfs stuff
and only hiding it for time being? And so we wouldn't be required
to do unnecessary initialisations while coming back?

Would that be worth it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/