Re: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor()

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 09/26/2013 08:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered.
> >
> > There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config,
> > periodic tick or tickless system.
> >
> > menu     => tickless system
> > periodic => periodic tick system
> >
> > IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes
> > sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ?
>
> I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)

Rafael is pretty busy ATM but may be he can give his feedback on this later.


--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/