Re: [PATCH V2 03/16] cpuidle: make __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() inline

[Paul Walmsley]

Hi

a comment on this one (and any similar patch)

On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() is a single line function and so deserves to be
> marked inline.

In general, this is a violation of Documentation/CodingStyle - see 
Chapter 15.

Unless this produces a significant benefit, it's probably best to just 
let the compiler do this if it wants.

- Paul


> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> index ced1df6..25455e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_driver *, cpuidle_drivers);
>    * Returns a pointer to struct cpuidle_driver or NULL if no driver has been
>    * registered for @cpu.
>    */
> -static struct cpuidle_driver *__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(int cpu)
> +static inline struct cpuidle_driver *__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(int cpu)
>   {
>   	return per_cpu(cpuidle_drivers, cpu);
>   }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/