Re: [PATCH 5/9][v5] powerpc: implement is_instr_load_store().

[Michael Ellerman]

On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 12:31 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Michael Ellerman [michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> | bool is_load_store(int ext_opcode)
> | {
> |         upper = ext_opcode >> 5;
> |         lower = ext_opcode & 0x1f;
> | 
> |         /* Short circuit as many misses as we can */
> |         if (lower < 3 || lower > 23)
> |             return false;
> 
> I see some loads/stores like these which are not covered by
> the above check. Is it ok to ignore them ?
> 
> 	lower == 29: ldepx, stdepx, eviddepx, evstddepx
> 
> 	lower == 31: lwepx, lbepx, lfdepx, stfdepx,

Those are the external process ID instructions, which I've never heard
of anyone using, I think we can ignore them.

> Looking through the opcode maps, I also see these for primary
> op code 4:
> 
> 	evldd, evlddx, evldwx, evldw, evldh, evldhx.
> 
> Should we include those also ?

Yes I think so. I didn't check any of the other opcodes for you.

cheers

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/