Re: [PATCH V5 3/9] perf tools: workaround objdump difficulties withkcore

[Adrian Hunter]

On 08/10/13 17:02, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> objdump fails to annotate module symbols when looking
>> at kcore.  Workaround this by extracting object code
>> from kcore and putting it in a temporary file for
>> objdump to use instead.  The temporary file is created
>> to look like kcore but contains only the function
>> being disassembled.
> 
> Excited to ses this one, but looks like I'm hitting some
> issue.  All annotation starts for me like this:
> 
>                                                                                                        â
>        â              Disassembly of section load0:                                                            â
>        â                                                                                                       â
>        â              ffffffff815eee80 <load0>:                                                                â
>   9.33 âffffffff815eee80:   data32 data32 data32 xchg %ax,%ax                                                  
> 
> 
> which does not seem right

Can you tell me the commits of the kernel and perf tools you
were using, plus the commands and what symbol it was?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/