Re: [PATCH V5 3/9] perf tools: workaround objdump difficulties withkcore

[Jiri Olsa]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:38:04PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 09/10/13 13:12, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:33:25AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >> On 08/10/13 17:02, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:

SNIP

> > 
> > so.. the name of the section, name of the <function> plus the first
> > instruction decode seem wrong.. I can see that in every symbol I
> > annotate in the report and in annotate command as well.
> 
> If you use the --asm-raw option you can see the bytes:
> 
> 	66 66 66 90 
> 
> That looks like a "nop" e.g. K8_NOP4 in arch/x86/include/asm/nops.h
> 

hum, wierd for all those functions to start with nop

ok, how about the '<load0>' function name?

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/