[PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 13/13] bonding/bond_alb.c: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive

[Paul E. McKenney]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces.  This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do.  However, the use in
bond_alb_handle_active_change() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer
to an element from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list
are already visible to caller.

This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the
pointer using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 91f179d5135c..cdd697cca6b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -1667,7 +1667,8 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
 	}
 
 	swap_slave = bond->curr_active_slave;
-	rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, new_slave);
+	rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave,
+			   rcu_access_pointer(new_slave));
 
 	if (!new_slave || list_empty(&bond->slave_list))
 		return;
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/