Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/13] decnet: Apply rcu_access_pointer()to avoid sparse false positive

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Wed Oct 09 2013 - 18:46:16 EST


On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:28:42PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:29:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
> > to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
> > which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
> > dn_insert_route() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer to an element
>
> Nit: "uses ... are", not "use ... is". :)

Don't I already have "use ... is"?

Thanx, Paul

> > from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already
> > visible to caller.
> >
> > This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the
> > pointer using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett.
> >
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-decnet-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> With or without the above typo fix:
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > net/decnet/dn_route.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
> > index fe32388ea24f..3b1357bcfc92 100644
> > --- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
> > +++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
> > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
> > /* Put it first */
> > *rthp = rth->dst.dn_next;
> > rcu_assign_pointer(rth->dst.dn_next,
> > - dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
> > + rcu_access_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain));
> > rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rth);
> >
> > dst_use(&rth->dst, now);
> > @@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
> > rthp = &rth->dst.dn_next;
> > }
> >
> > - rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dn_next, dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dn_next,
> > + rcu_access_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain));
> > rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rt);
> >
> > dst_use(&rt->dst, now);
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/