Re: [PATCH v8 02/17] arm64: define DMA_ERROR_CODE

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:48:15PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 8d18100..c2cb8a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  
>  #define ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK
>  
> +#define DMA_ERROR_CODE	(~0)

Hmm, is this guaranteed to be large enough for a dma_addr_t? Other 64-bit
architectures using a non-zero error code cast to dma_addr_t before the
negation.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/