Re: [PATCH v5] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Date: Thu Oct 10 2013 - 05:55:26 EST


On Thursday 10 October 2013 03:09 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:32:57AM +0100, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a
>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible
>> types for backward compatibility.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes from v4:
>> * added compatible property "ti,twl6035-usb-vid"
>>
>> Changes from v3:
>> * Fixed commit log message (VID to VBUS-ID).
>> * Fixed the Documentation to tell "ti,twl6035-usb" and "ti,palmas-usb" is
>> deprecated
>> Changes from [1]:
>> * Since the old compatible values will be in 3.11 kernel, we shouldn't remove
>> the old compatible values. So retain the old compatible values.
>>
>> [1] -> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg95843.html
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt | 4 +++-
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>> index 7dab6a8..ce2100f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>> @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ EXTCON FOR PALMAS/TWL CHIPS
>>
>> PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
>> Required Properties:
>> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid" or "ti,twl6035-usb-vid".
>> + "ti,twl6035-usb" and "ti,palmas-usb" is deprecated and is kept
>> + for backward compatibility.
>
> How about having these one per line, with a description:
>
> - compatible: should contain one of:
> * "ti,palmas-usb-vid" for palmas systems.
> * "ti,twl6035-usb-vid" for twl6035 systems.
> * "ti,palmas-usb" (DEPRECATED - use "ti,palmas-usb-vid").
> * "ti,twl6035-usb" (DEPRECATED - use "ti,twl6035-usb-vid").
>
> That makes it easier to add to in future, and hopefully makes things a
> bit clearer.
>
> I don't think we need to state it's kept for backwards compatiblity.
> The set of strings Linux understands is a Linux detail rather than a dt
> detail.
>
>>
>> Optional Properties:
>> - ti,wakeup : To enable the wakeup comparator in probe
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> index 6c91976..6e83e9a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> @@ -269,7 +269,9 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops palmas_pm_ops = {
>>
>> static struct of_device_id of_palmas_match_tbl[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,palmas-usb", },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,palmas-usb-vid", },
>> { .compatible = "ti,twl6035-usb", },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,twl6035-usb-vid", },
>
> It might be worth a /* DEPRECATED */ note on the old strings.
>
> Otherwise, the looks sensible to me.

Ok. I'll change it in the next version.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/