Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: moveacpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

[Mika Westerberg]

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
> >>> functional changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
> >> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
> >> 100% right.
> >
> > I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
> > version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
> > that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
> > series?
> 
> The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think?
> So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into
> linux-next as that comes back online.
> 
> So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on
> yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here...

Correct, this series depends on Alexandre's patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/