Re: [PATCH v8 02/17] arm64: define DMA_ERROR_CODE

From: Stefano Stabellini
Date: Tue Oct 15 2013 - 11:47:56 EST


On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:48:15PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > index 8d18100..c2cb8a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >
> > #define ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK
> >
> > +#define DMA_ERROR_CODE (~0)
>
> Hmm, is this guaranteed to be large enough for a dma_addr_t? Other 64-bit
> architectures using a non-zero error code cast to dma_addr_t before the
> negation.

Good catch! I'll fix it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/