Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix ordering of jumpstack allocation andtable update

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:14:53PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:18:13PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 17:57 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Hi Pablo,
> > > 
> > 
> > > > We also need fixes for net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c and
> > > > net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c as well. Could you extend this patch
> > > > and resend?
> > > 
> > > Sure, I can try, but that's going to require a bit of time to sit down and
> > > look at the shared data, access order, dependencies etc. I'm currently
> > > preparing for Edinburgh, so it might be a while before I get a chance to
> > > extend this.
> > 
> > That's basically same code copy/pasted, so it should be relatively easy.
> 
> Ok, I took a look and I think I see what you mean: there are just some
> additional consumers of the tables, so there aren't any additional writers
> afaict (at least, net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c uses rw locks so we don't
> have an issue there).
> 
> Attempt at an updated patch below.

Applied, thanks Will.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/