Re: [PATCH 2/9] backlight: atmel-pwm-bl: fix gpio polarity in remove

From: Johan Hovold
Date: Tue Oct 29 2013 - 09:08:23 EST


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:09:28PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 11:55 Wed 23 Oct , Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Make sure to honour gpio polarity also at remove so that the backlight
> > is actually disabled on boards with active-low enable pin.
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > index 8aac273..3cb0094 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > @@ -205,8 +205,10 @@ static int atmel_pwm_bl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct atmel_pwm_bl *pwmbl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > - if (pwmbl->gpio_on != -1)
> > - gpio_set_value(pwmbl->gpio_on, 0);
> > + if (pwmbl->gpio_on != -1) {
> here we need to use gpio_is_valid

That is a different issue which is fixed by patch 7/9. It doesn't make
sense to only change one of the gpio-validity tests.

Johan

> > + gpio_set_value(pwmbl->gpio_on,
> > + 0 ^ pwmbl->pdata->on_active_low);
> > + }
> > pwm_channel_disable(&pwmbl->pwmc);
> > pwm_channel_free(&pwmbl->pwmc);
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.4
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/