Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: Remove redundant return statement

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, November 01, 2013 12:09:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 October 2013 23:57, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > After commit dfa5bb622555d9da0df21b50f46ebdeef390041b
> > "cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency",
> > this return statement is no longer needed.
> >
> > Reported-by: Henrik Nilsson <Karl.Henrik.Nilsson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > index 32f26f6..18d4091 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > @@ -168,7 +168,6 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
> >                         dbs_info->rate_mult =
> >                                 od_tuners->sampling_down_factor;
> >                 dbs_freq_increase(policy, policy->max);
> > -               return;
> >         } else {
> >                 /* Calculate the next frequency proportional to load */
> >                 unsigned int freq_next;
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Queued up for 3.13, thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/