Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] x86: speed up int3-based patching using lessparanoid write

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Nov 08 2013 - 07:43:48 EST


On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:04:26 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (2013/11/08 18:12), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > This change is inspired by the int3-based patching code used in
> > ftrace. See the commit fd4363fff3d9 (x86: Introduce int3
> > (breakpoint)-based instruction patching).
> >
> > When trying to use text_poke_bp in ftrace, the result was slower than
> > the original implementation.
> >
> > It turned out that one difference was in text_poke vs. ftrace_write.
> > text_poke did many extra operations to make sure that the change
> > was atomic.
>
> AFAIK, the main reason why text_poke is used is avoiding
> RODATA protection (by alias mapping).

That is correct, and the reason ftrace didn't do that is because it
would be quite expensive to map 22,000 addresses for each change.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/