Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() andprohibit probing on .entry.text

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
> > 
> > OK, I'll do. :)
> > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me
> > to post the series, linux-arch?
> 
> I would add linux-arch.
> 
> Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as 
> new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in 
> LKML).

We'd rather like to know about all cases where new code is added to 
kprobes (or where we missed to consider some existing code).

It's really just a handful of annotations, the brunt of which is internal 
to kprobes.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/