Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] omap hwspinlock dt support

[Mark Rutland]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:16:42PM +0000, Anna, Suman wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is an updated series addressing the review comments from the
> > v2 series. The hwmod patches have been dropped from the repost
> > as per Paul's request, they have already been queued.
> 
> Mark,

Hi Suman,

> 
> Any comments on this series? Tony has picked up the OMAP DTS patches for 
> 3.13, and so
> the "ti,omap4-hwspinlock" compatible string is showing up as 
> undocumented in linux-next.
> How do you want me to proceed here? I will be separating out the 
> bindings into separate patches
> in the future.

The only thing I note that I'm not so keen on is that the
hwlock-specifier is always one cell, rather than using a #hwlock-cells
property on the provider (even if we required it to be <1> for the
moment and just failed if it wasn't).

If possible, I would like an amendment to always use #hwlock-cells, but
otherwise this looks fine to me. Feel free to add my Ack:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/