Re: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I'm not saying that we are actually getting into nohz, but something
> > with the nohz code is messing with cpu accounting.
> 
> The trace does indeed show that a tick is happening, as the config has
> HZ=250 (4ms) and we see a tick happen every 4ms. But for some reason,
> we don't update the the idle time correctly when nohz is enabled.
> 
> When I say nohz is enabled, I mean that we don't have nohz=off in the
> command line. There seems to be some difference between having nohz=off
> and having nohz disabled at runtime.

Right that affects tick_nohz_enabled

Two files use this variable:
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
kernel/time/tick-sched.c

The only accounting related stuff is in tick-sched.c:

get_cpu_idle_time_us() and get_cpu_iowait_time_us()

Both functions bail out if (!tick_nohz_enabled).

The users of get_cpu_idle_time_us() are cpufreq and fs/proc/stat.c!

Now the simplest fix is to let those functions check whether we
actually switched into NOHZ mode. Should work for the RCU tree stuff
as well.

Thanks,

	tglx



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/