Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] ARM: use a function table for determininginstruction interpreter actions

From: Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2013 - 12:11:26 EST


On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:04 -0400, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When interpreting instructions use a client-supplied array of functions
> to take action. This array can then be provided by krpobes, uprobes, or

'to take action' sounds a bit weird to me, how about 'to specify
actions'?

> possibly some other client subsystem. The interpreter assigns a group
> number to each recognized instruction and invokes the corresponding action
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-arm.c | 41 ++
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c | 3 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c | 1016 ++++----------------------------------
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c | 10 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.h | 14 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.c | 114 ++---
> arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.h | 37 ++
> arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.c | 875 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.h | 136 +++++
> arch/arm/kernel/probes.c | 9 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/probes.h | 15 +-
> 12 files changed, 1288 insertions(+), 984 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-thumb.h

As I mentioned in comments to patch 7, this patch seems to accidentally
include the thumb code reorg of moving code from kprobes-thumb.c to
probes-thumb.c

I've no other comments on the patch so trimmed the rest...

--
Tixy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/