Re: [PATCH v2] power: Replace printks with dev_* and pr_* routines

From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Nov 19 2013 - 14:07:36 EST


On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:57 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 11:53 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:46 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> Replaced printks with dev_* and pr_* routines. Replacing printk in
> >> __suspend_report_result() will require passing in struct device *
> >> pointer from calling routines and this will require changes to
> >> external interface suspend_report_result() which is used by several
> >> drivers. Hence, this one instance is replaced by pr_err().
> > []
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > []
> >> @@ -1308,9 +1308,8 @@ int dpm_prepare(pm_message_t state)
> >> error = 0;
> >> continue;
> >> }
> >> - printk(KERN_INFO "PM: Device %s not prepared "
> >> - "for power transition: code %d\n",
> >> - dev_name(dev), error);
> >> + dev_info("PM: not prepared for power transition: ",
> >> + "code %d\n", error);
> >
> > Shuah, you have to make sure the files modified by
> > your patches compile successfully before sending
> > patches like this.
> Oops. I did compile. Missed the warning. Sorry about that.

btw:

When you're doing patches like this, not bugfixes,
not something that's going to be applied to current
or stable, please make them against -next and not
against Linus' tree.

Also, I would make the larger change that modifies
all the drivers like I suggested. What you've done
I think is a half-measure and is incomplete.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/