[PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real prototype

From: Elena Ufimtseva
Date: Fri Nov 22 2013 - 17:23:37 EST


Based on Richard Weinberger patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/16/510
Functions like this one are evil:

void foo()
{
...
}

Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- added white space in regular expression between (), based
on comments from Joe Perches.

scripts/checkpatch.pl | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 61090e0..08c95c0 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2785,6 +2785,19 @@ sub process {
"open brace '{' following function declarations go on the next line\n" . $herecurr);
}

+ if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
+ ERROR("FUNCTION_NO_PROTOTYPE",
+"Bad function definition - $1() should probably be $1(void)\n" . $herecurr .
+"\nThou shalt not, in the language of C, under any circumstances, on the
+pain of death, declare or define a function with an empty set of
+parentheses, for though in the language of C++ it meaneth the same as
+(void), in C it meaneth (...) which is of meaningless as there be no
+anchor argument by which the types of the varadic arguments can be
+expressed, and which misleadeth the compiler into allowing unsavory code
+and in some cases generate really ugly stuff for varadic handling.
+ -hpa\n");
+ }
+
# open braces for enum, union and struct go on the same line.
if ($line =~ /^.\s*{/ &&
$prevline =~ /^.\s*(?:typedef\s+)?(enum|union|struct)(?:\s+$Ident)?\s*$/) {
--
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/