Re: [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: orion: reverse irq handling priority

[Jason Cooper]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Non-DT irq handlers were working through irq causes from most-significant
> to least-significant bit, while DT irqchip driver does it the other way
> round. This revealed some more HW issues on Kirkwood peripheral IP, where
> spurious sdio irqs can happen although IP's irq enable registers are all
> zero. Although, not directly related with the described issue, reverse
> irq bit handling back to original order by replacing ffs() with fls().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-orion.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/