Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI: Destroy pci dev only once

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Tue Nov 26 2013 - 14:34:29 EST


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Mutliple removing via /sys will call pci_destroy_dev two times.
>>
>> | When concurent removing pci devices which are in the same pci subtree
>> | via sysfs, such as:
>> | echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove ; echo -n 1 >
>> | /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove
>> | (1a:01.0 device is downstream from the 10:00.0 bridge)
>> |
>> | the following warning will show:
>> | [ 1799.280918] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> | [ 1799.336199] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 126 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry+0x63/0xd0()
>> | [ 1799.433093] list_del corruption, ffff8807b4a7c000->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000100100)
>> | [ 1800.276623] CPU: 7 PID: 126 Comm: kworker/u512:1 Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc5+ #196
>> | [ 1800.508918] Workqueue: sysfsd sysfs_schedule_callback_work
>> | [ 1800.574703] 0000000000000009 ffff8807adbadbd8 ffffffff8168b26c ffff8807c27d08a8
>> | [ 1800.663860] ffff8807adbadc28 ffff8807adbadc18 ffffffff810711dc ffff8807adbadc68
>> | [ 1800.753130] ffff8807b4a7c000 ffff8807b4a7c000 ffff8807ad089c00 0000000000000000
>> | [ 1800.842282] Call Trace:
>> | [ 1800.871651] [<ffffffff8168b26c>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
>> | [ 1800.933301] [<ffffffff810711dc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
>> | [ 1801.005283] [<ffffffff810712c6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
>> | [ 1801.074081] [<ffffffff8135a343>] __list_del_entry+0x63/0xd0
>> | [ 1801.141839] [<ffffffff8135a3c1>] list_del+0x11/0x40
>> | [ 1801.201320] [<ffffffff813734da>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x6a/0xe0
>> | [ 1801.274279] [<ffffffff8137356e>] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x1e/0x30
>> | [ 1801.356606] [<ffffffff8137b20b>] remove_callback+0x2b/0x40
>> | [ 1801.423412] [<ffffffff81251848>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x18/0x60
>> | [ 1801.503744] [<ffffffff8108eab5>] process_one_work+0x1f5/0x540
>> | [ 1801.573640] [<ffffffff8108ea53>] ? process_one_work+0x193/0x540
>> | [ 1801.645616] [<ffffffff8108f2ac>] worker_thread+0x11c/0x370
>> | [ 1801.712337] [<ffffffff8108f190>] ? rescuer_thread+0x350/0x350
>> | [ 1801.782178] [<ffffffff8109731d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
>> | [ 1801.841661] [<ffffffff81097230>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
>> | [ 1801.919919] [<ffffffff8169cc3c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>> | [ 1801.984608] [<ffffffff81097230>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
>> | [ 1802.062825] ---[ end trace d77f2054de000fb7 ]---
>> |
>> | This issue is related to the bug 54411:
>> | https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
>>
>> Add is_removed to record if pci_destroy_dev is called already.
>>
>> During second calling, still have extra dev ref hold via
>> device_schedule_call, so we are safe to check dev->is_removed.
>>
>> It fixs the problem In Gu's test.
>>
>> -v2: add partial changelog from Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> refresh after patch of moving device_del from Rafael.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/remove.c | 8 +++++---
>> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
>> index f452148..b090cec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
>> @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>
>> static void pci_destroy_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> - device_del(&dev->dev);
>> -
>> - put_device(&dev->dev);
>> + if (!dev->is_removed) {
>> + device_del(&dev->dev);
>> + dev->is_removed = 1;
>
> As Rafael pointed out, this looks like a race. What prevents two
> concurrent calls to pci_destroy_dev() from seeing "dev->is_removed ==
> 0" and both calling device_del() on the same device?

I don't think that is going to happen. as those two pci_destroy_dev is
serialized
during
echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove ; echo -n 1 >
/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove
is called.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/