Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf tools: Add trace-event global object fortracepoint interface

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Wed Nov 27 2013 - 10:28:26 EST


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:10:45PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:46:00PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > 2013-11-25 (ì), 17:03 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:47:14AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > 2013-11-21 (ë), 12:01 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > > > > In order to get the proper plugins processing we need to
> > > > > use full trace-event interface when creating tracepoint
> > > > > events. So far we were using shortcut to get the parsed
> > > > > format.
> > > > >
> > > > > Moving current 'event_format__new' function into trace-event
> > > > > object as 'trace_event__tp_format'.
> > > > >
> > > > > This function uses properly initialized global trace-event
> > > > > object, ensuring proper plugins processing.
> > > >
> > > > I see this when I compile it on my old ubuntu 10.04 box (with gcc 4.4.3)
> > > >
> > > > CC util/trace-event.o
> > > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > > > util/trace-event.c: In function 'trace_event__tp_format':
> > > > util/trace-event.c:63: error: not protecting function: no buffer at
> > > > least 8 bytes long
> > > > make[1]: *** [util/trace-event.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > hum, what was the stackprotector status?
> > >
> > > ... stackprotector: [ on ]
> > > ... stackprotector-all: [ on ]
> >
> > Right. Both of them were turned on.
> >
> > Auto-detecting system features:
> > ... backtrace: [ on ]
> > ... dwarf: [ on ]
> > ... fortify-source: [ on ]
> > ... glibc: [ on ]
> > ... gtk2: [ on ]
> > ... gtk2-infobar: [ on ]
> > ... libaudit: [ on ]
> > ... libbfd: [ on ]
> > ... libelf: [ on ]
> > ... libelf-getphdrnum: [ OFF ]
> > ... libelf-mmap: [ on ]
> > ... libnuma: [ OFF ]
> > ... libperl: [ on ]
> > ... libpython: [ on ]
> > ... libpython-version: [ on ]
> > ... libslang: [ on ]
> > ... libunwind: [ OFF ]
> > ... on-exit: [ on ]
> > ... stackprotector: [ on ]
> > ... stackprotector-all: [ on ]
> > ... timerfd: [ on ]
>
> I found that -fstack-protector might not always work:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/691722
>
> they say it was fixed in gcc 4.5.0 which I was not
> able to prove in gcc release notes..
>
> we could disable the warning like in the below
> for gcc < 4.5.0, could you please test?
>
> any other idea? ;-)

or remove -Wstack-protector option completely, as it's just informative
seems there's nothing you could do about the warning anyway

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/