Re: [PATCH] block: fix mq request allocation

From: Jeff Moyer
Date: Mon Dec 02 2013 - 10:20:34 EST


Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned() may return NULL request in case of
> !__GFP_WAIT, so cause its callers to derefence NULL pointer for
> releasing current context.
>
> This patch introduces two flags to address the issue.

Hi, Ming,


Good catch, but your patch seems overly complicated. How about
something like the following (compile-tested only), instead? Note that
I did not touch blk_make_request, as the put_ctx there seems to
correlate to a get_ctx earlier in the function (not a leaked reference
from __blk_mq_alloc_request).

-Jeff

p.s. Jens, every time I see GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_WAIT, my head explodes. Just sayin'.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>


diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index cdc629c..70fd6f9 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -202,10 +202,12 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned(struct request_queue *q,
if (rq) {
blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(q, ctx, rq, rw);
break;
- } else if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
- break;
+ }

blk_mq_put_ctx(ctx);
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
+ break;
+
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
blk_mq_wait_for_tags(hctx->tags);
} while (1);
@@ -222,7 +224,8 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw,
return NULL;

rq = blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned(q, rw, gfp, reserved);
- blk_mq_put_ctx(rq->mq_ctx);
+ if (rq)
+ blk_mq_put_ctx(rq->mq_ctx);
return rq;
}

@@ -235,7 +238,8 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_reserved_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw,
return NULL;

rq = blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned(q, rw, gfp, true);
- blk_mq_put_ctx(rq->mq_ctx);
+ if (rq)
+ blk_mq_put_ctx(rq->mq_ctx);
return rq;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_reserved_request);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/