Re: [PATCH 1/7] perf script: Do not call perf_event__preprocess_sample()twice)

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Wed Dec 04 2013 - 09:02:08 EST


On 03/12/13 20:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:23:04AM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> perf_event__preprocess_sample() is called in
>> process_sample_event(). Instead of calling it
>> again in perf_evsel__print_ip(), pass though
>> the resultant addr_location.
>
> <SNIP>
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> @@ -1487,11 +1487,12 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_session__find_first_evtype(struct perf_session *session,
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> -void perf_evsel__print_ip(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
>> +void perf_evsel__print_ip(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>> + union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
>
> Why do we have to keep this parameter?

You are right - it is not needed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/