Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: s3c2410: dont need CPU_FREQ transitions for exynosseries

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi Naveen,

On Tuesday 26 of November 2013 09:52:46 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> For Exynos4 and Exynos5 SoCs from Samsung the i2c clock is based
> on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and therefore is completely
> independent of the cpu frequency.
> Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful.
> 
> This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to
> cpu_freq_transition only if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX is enabled.
> 
> This change should save a bunch of cpufreq transitions calls
> which does not apply to exynos SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> As per discussion at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3235091/
> Post f023f8dd59 commit we should be using
> ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ instead of CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX
> 
> upstrea linux kernel and linuxsamsung already has the commit
> f023f8dd59. Hence, rebasing the patch.
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Wolfram, are you okay with this patch?

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/