Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree.
> > > Christoph, should I also pickup 14?  Or can that go through x86?
> >
> > Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept
> > separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized:
> 
> 13/14 can be just merged. There are no dependencies on earlier 
> patches.
> 
> If you want to merge 18 then you would need to pick up also 15-17.

So I'm referring to the 'This is required' wording here:

| Subject: [PATCH 14/41] x86: Rename __this_cpu_xxx_# operations to raw_cpu_xxx_#
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different 
| naming.
|
| Change the names from __this_cpu_xxxx_# to raw_cpu_xxxx_#.
|
| Also changes the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h.
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different naming.


By what is this required - by the previous patch #13?

Also, the changelog indicates it's two changes - please split the 
patch in two if so.

(Tejun, please wait for this review to be complete before committing 
anything.)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/