Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Move pm8xxx-irq.c contents into only driverthat uses it

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Dec 12 2013 - 14:06:27 EST


On 12/11/13 01:35, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The pm8xxx-irq.c code is practically mandatory given that the
>> pm8921-core driver will WARN about it missing and the Kconfig
>> marks it as default y when a PM8xxx chips is enabled. The only
>> reason the file was split out was because we planned to support
>> other pm8xxx chips with different pm8xxx-core.c files. Now that
>> we have DT on ARM this isn't necessary because we should be able
>> to support all the ssbi based PM8xxx chips in one driver and one
>> file with no data bloat. Let's move this code into the only
>> driver that uses it right now (pm8921) so that it's always compiled when
>> needed. In the future we can rename pm8921-core.c to something
>> more generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 --
>> drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c | 349 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/mfd/pm8xxx-irq.c | 371 ----------------------------------------------
> If you're going to take this approach (which I'm fine with unless
> there are likely to be anymore incarnations of pm8xxx chips?), I think
> you should also clean-up the header in this patch.
>
> include/linux/mfd/pm8xxx/irq.h
>

Thanks. I'll remove the header and resend.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/