On 11/20/13 10:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote:Ping? I don't see this patch in linux-next yet so should I send thisOn Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. OtherwiseThe 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. UpgradeBuild and run-tested, appears to work.
to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
registration interface.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested.
arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part
of a bigger conversion series?
we can send it through the tip/timers tree.
through the tip/timers tree?