Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the firstentry in the wait-list

From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Date: Fri Dec 13 2013 - 01:24:31 EST


Hello Ingo & Peter,

I added Greg on Cc.

W dniu 12.12.2013 13:52, Peter Zijlstra pisze:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:02:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:35 PM
To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kyungmin Park; Marek Szyprowski; Ingo
Molnar
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the
first entry in the wait-list

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:32PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
Use list_first_entry instead of explicitly accessing the first entry
with "head".next. The comment one line above becomes obsolete.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

For quite a long time I've been sending the same SOB lines to the
linux-usb list.

Can you please refer here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74981.html



v1..v2:

- corrected the email address in the second Signed-off-by line

Still invalid; the problem is that you appear to have written the patch
(you send it and you have first sob).


So what is Kyungmin doing in the line? He did not send me your patch.

Internal review process, and it represents this patch comes from.

For review we have this specific tag, oddly called: 'Reviewed-by'.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/