Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

[bilhuang]

On 12/18/2013 07:11 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale
> > VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails
> > so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if
> > we're going to support voltage scaling.
>
> But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code?
cpufreq-cpu0 driver will call regulator_set_voltage_tol() directly 
according to the pre-defined OPP freq/volt pairs, the regulator drivers 
could be shared by other SoC so is not suitable to handle this, or do I 
misunderstand?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/