Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Do not show stats if workload fails
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Thu Dec 26 2013 - 09:26:45 EST
Em Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:17AM -0500, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/26/13, 9:15 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Right, but I can't apply that patch, as it makes 'perf stat
> >whatever-workload' to fail, as I realized when doing a demo to someone
> >interested in using perf ;-\
> >So for now I'm not applying that one.
> right, so you want one with < 0 check or wait for something else? I
> was not expecting to find it in your perf/core branch, yet there it
I'll remove it from there, but try it, IIRC there will be some other
I'd have to reread the messages I sent, but from what I recall the
return from perf_evlist__start_workload() will _always_ be valid, i.e.
what you're testing there is just if the parent wrote a byte to a pipe
to signal the waiting child to call exec, and that _will_ work, the
exec()? perhaps not, you'd have to setup the signal error reporting
Perhaps this should be somehow done by perf_evlist__start_workload, so
that what it reports is the result of the exec in the child, and not
merely if it managed to tell it to try to exec...
> >Ah, at this point elves are everywhere, dammit! ;-)
> An elf put it there?
Right, dwarves may be involved, didn't had the time to figure that
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/