Re: [PATCH] Add the LED burst trigger
From: Richard Purdie
Date: Fri Dec 27 2013 - 17:53:20 EST
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 18:13 +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > Well, this one will be really smaller. And yes, it will make some
> > memory non-swappable, but I believe with triggers and infrastructure
> > for N900 (and similar) it will be worth it.
> Ah yes thats such a major proportion of platforms
> > Plus, it will actually save CPU cycles, and thus significant power.
> All of which will be totally wiped out if you bump all the millions of
> x86 server boxes in the world up by one page of kernel space and cause a
> few disk I/Os
FWIW the LED subsystem was designed to take advantage of kernel modules.
If you don't use a given trigger, it needn't be in memory, loaded or
even built at all. If something changed there which made that not
possible, that would be rather sad.
I agree with you that we shouldn't bump the kernel size unnecessarily
but I don't think triggers should do so. I actually think the kernel
could do with going on a diet and at least made so you can untangle more
of the pieces you don't want/need.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/