Re: [PATCH] x86, irq, fix logical AND/OR error in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Fri Dec 27 2013 - 20:07:44 EST
On 12/27/2013 08:13 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Back to my question, assume cpu1 will be off-lined and one irq affinity is
>> set as (1, 2) -- this irq will be bypassed. Looks good. But if one irq
>> affinity is set as only (1), -- this irq is bypassed, too. Not right!
> Oh, yes, this is a bug. ... and as you point out ...
Does this mean the patch that is currently in my tree should not be
pushed to Linus? It sounds like that to me...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/