Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched, rt: move .switched_from out of the scope ofCONFIG_SMP

[Kirill Tkhai]

On ÐÐ, ÐÐÐ 28, 2013 at 05:37:32 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On ÐÑ, ÐÐÐ 27, 2013 at 07:41:00 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> .switched_from shouldn't be initialized in the scope of CONFIG_SMP,
> >> so this patch is trying to move it out.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  kernel/sched/rt.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> >> index 1c40655..f34d41b 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> >> @@ -2002,9 +2002,9 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
> >>       .pre_schedule           = pre_schedule_rt,
> >>       .post_schedule          = post_schedule_rt,
> >>       .task_woken             = task_woken_rt,
> >> -     .switched_from          = switched_from_rt,
> >>  #endif
> >>
> >> +     .switched_from          = switched_from_rt,
> >>       .set_curr_task          = set_curr_task_rt,
> >>       .task_tick              = task_tick_rt,
> >
> > This will not be compilable in !SMP mode because the body of switched_from_rt()
> > is still under CONFIG_SMP define.
> How about also removing its body out?

switched_from_rt() is necessary only in SMP mode, so I think we should
not change anything connected with it here. It's already initialized
properly.

> >
> > Kirill
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/