Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Add hci_h4p driver
From: Sebastian Reichel
Date: Mon Dec 30 2013 - 08:20:51 EST
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:13:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, I can rename config option, but renaming the module would break
> existing userland, no?
Why is the userland depending on the module name?
> > Can we also make this just depend on some device tree information
> > and not on a specific architecture. I know that this driver is
> > pretty much OMAP specific, but if we want this upstream, we should
> > at least try to make it more generic.
> Nokia N900 is certainly moving towards device tree, but we are not
> ready, yet...
Tony plans to remove OMAP3 boardcode (incl. omap3-rx51) in 3.14.
> > > [...]
> > >
> > Please do not introduce public includes for a driver. This
> > should be all confined to the driver itself or if it platform
> > data, it should go into the place for platform data.
> (Could you insert newlines after 80 or so characters?)
> Where would you like platform_data definition to go? That indeed is
> for platform data, and quick grep shows drivers normally do public
> header files for that.
Probably it can simply be removed, because it's not useful in 3.14?
Description: Digital signature