Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/msm: Drop unnecessary mach include
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Dec 31 2013 - 00:16:16 EST
On 12/30, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> This file doesn't use the clk_reset() API that is exposed in
> >> mach-msm's mach/clk.h file. Remove the include so that this
> >> driver can be compiled as part of the multi-platform kernel.
> > Thanks!
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
I think you mean Acked-by? Signed-off-by usually means you're
sending the patch along.
> oh, fwiw, things are a bit re-arranged on msm-next-staging (to add
> 8074 and 8060a support).. currently I have:
> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM)
> # include <mach/clk.h>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> /* stubs we need for compile-test: */
> static inline struct device *msm_iommu_get_ctx(const char *ctx_name)
> return NULL;
> Not really sure what to do about msm_iommu_get_ctx(), or whether I
> still need that?
I think the drm Kconfig should be selecting the MSM iommu Kconfig
symbol. At least for now, it's a direct compile time dependency
of this driver. I still don't see a use of mach/clk.h though, so
we should be able to drop it completely.
Is your msm-next-staging tree going into v3.14? I don't see
anything in linux-next so far.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/